I usually approach such reading with trepidation, however when Jonathan Douglas Chairman of the National Literacy Trust described it as ‘exhilarating’ my ears pricked up.
The Review recognises the success and popularity of the EYFS and that it will be some time before this will be fully embedded in practice. It therefore does not recommend radical change, but maintaining EYFS in its current form whilst fine tuning certain aspects. I’m sure this will be a relief to many who are only just getting to grips with the EYFS and dread being faced with even more change. The tone of the report feels very much as though Dame Tickell has listened to the many individuals and organisations involved in the consultation and shows a commitment to the importance of early education. The review supports learning through play, active learning, creativity and critical thinking as characteristics for effective teaching and recommends that the EYFS remains inclusive and mandatory.
There are a number of recommendations in the review including:-
- A greater emphasis on parental partnership . The EYFS should be more accessible to parents by making sure it is in plain English. I also think this would really help with the wide range of people that use it and help to remove any ambiguity . In addition an online interactive version of EYFS is recommended that would be accessible to parents.
- A reduction of the Early Learning Goals from 69 to 17, with a simple scale defining the skills needed for emerging, expecting and exceeding each goal. Anything that reduces targets has to be a good thing in my opinion and the examples of the simple scale are very clear.
- A commitment to greater clarity on the level of paperwork required, alongside the suggestion that paperwork should be reduced. This sits alongside the recommendation that Ofsted and the Local Authority work together to ensure that no unnecessary demands made.
- There continues to be an emphasis on formative assessment based on observations of daily activities to illustrate children’s learning. Summative assessment (the Foundation Stage Profile) will be significantly reduced and there is a call for stronger links between EYFS and KS1.
- A call to investigate as a matter of urgency the suitability of a ratio of 1:30 in reception classes.
- A commitment to recruiting a professional and highly qualified workforce including a review of Early Years training courses and a clear progressive structure for qualifications. I just hope that this quality is maintained by providing financial incentives.
- A recommended change to the areas of learning. This would create 3 Prime areas – Communication and Language, Personal, Social and Emotional and Physical and 4 further areas through which these will be applied. These would be Literacy, Maths, Expressive Arts and Design and Understanding the World. I am undecided as to whether the separation of Communication and Language from Literacy will lead to a greater emphasis on speaking and listening or whether it will detract from the interdependence of reading, writing, speaking and listening. I hope that there will be clear advice as to what early literacy is . I am a little disheartened that literacy is defined in terms of reading and writing and that definitions have not been reframed for a new technological age. I am also unsure about the change from Creativity to
- Expressive Arts and Design. I am certain that it has been changed to avoid ambiguity, but creativity encompasses so much more than art and design, that I would hope that this would be fostered in diverse ways. It is good to see that technology has a specific mention in Understanding the World.
- A review of children’s development at aged 2-2.5 sharing knowledge from all agencies.
The examples of good practice in the appendices make good reading and there are some thought provoking quotations interspersed throughout. Reading the whole document takes some time, but is worthwhile. If you didn’t want to read the whole review the summary of recommendations in Annex 2 will give an overview.
I watch with interest to see how policy makers will adopt these recommendations for the new EYFS.
The full consultation report can be viewed here http://www.education.gov.uk/tickellreview
2 thoughts on “My Thoughts on the Tickell Review of the Early Years Foundation Stage”
I too will eagerly await how Dame Tickell’s review is interpreted…my view is, as I said, that this is a missed opportunity to reform (remove?) something, not really a “new EYFS”. Tinkering around the edges, I suspect, is all we’re get but it might just, just allow sensitive and professional educators in early years to get on with what they know best?
Speaking with a practitioner yesterday, she was saying that in her view, there was so little space to get on with the real work with children, inhibited by endless paperwork and bean-counting. In her setting, photographs are taken of children before they, say, visit the local park. They are printed off and form part of the necessary odds and ends that need to go with practitioners on the trip. This is so that should one of them go astray, then an immediate image is available for the police on their subsequent search. This isn’t part of the EYFS, of course, and naturally children need to be safe, but we just got to thinking that this kind of micro-management is a bit over-the-top?
thanks for your comment.
Let’s hope the review will remove some of the constraints on early years workers who just want to go with the children. Hopefully it will remove some of the ambiguity of interpretation and enable practitioners to ease up on the paperwork and trust their own judgement.